Prediction of Jane Taylor vs Louise Pleming Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Taylor vs L. Pleming

Jane Taylor

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

126

Best Rank

290

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Louise Pleming

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

126

Best Rank

290

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Taylor 1 - 0 Pleming

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jane Taylor winning 2 and Louise Pleming winning 0. The last match between Jane Taylor and Louise Pleming was at the ITF Melbourne 2, 27-11-1989, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Jane Taylor getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Taylor	1
Pleming	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) ITF Melbourne 2(11-27-89)

Stats

Jane Taylor

Louise Pleming

J. Taylor vs L. Pleming H2H Profile

J. Taylor	Stats	L. Pleming
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
61.22% (161-102)	Career Total W/L	32.88% (48-98)
1	Hard	0
7	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Taylor vs L. Pleming Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jane Taylor has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Louise Pleming has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jane Taylor, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Louise Pleming has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jane Taylor has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Louise Pleming has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jane Taylor has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Louise Pleming winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jane Taylor has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 46/18), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 38% (W/L 9/15). Louise Pleming has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 72% (W/L 22/26), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 15% (W/L 4/23).
Player level: In the last year, Jane Taylor has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Louise Pleming has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jane Taylor winning 1 times and Louise Pleming being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jane Taylor winning 2 and Louise Pleming winning 0.
The last match between Jane Taylor and Louise Pleming was at the ITF Melbourne 2, 27-11-1989, Round: R4, Surface: Hard, with Jane Taylor getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jane Taylor has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Louise Pleming has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jane Taylor has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Louise Pleming has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jane Taylor has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Louise Pleming has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jane Taylor vs Louise Pleming Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Taylor vs L. Pleming H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Taylor	Stats	L. Pleming
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Taylor Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Danamon Open - Jakarta - 21-04-1997
R1 Liza AndriyaniL. Andriyani	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
Australian Open - Melbourne - 13-01-1997
R1 Maria Sanchez LorenzoM. Sanchez	W	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R2 Tamarine TanasugarnT. Tanasugarn	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Hope Island 25K - 09-12-1996
Anna SmashnovaA. Smashnova	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
R4 Kirrily SharpeK. Sharpe	W	6-2 5-7 7-5	Stats

View All

L. Pleming Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hope Island 25K - 09-12-1996
R3 Kirrily SharpeK. Sharpe	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Pattaya - 18-11-1996
Q1 Petra RampreP. Rampre	L	6-2 7-5	Stats
Beijing - 14-10-1996
Q1 Yuko HosokiY. Hosoki	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Surabaya - 07-10-1996
Q2 Tzu Ting WengT. Ting	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Roanoke 25K - 29-07-1996
R3 Nino LouarsabishviliN. Louarsabishvili	L	6-4 7-6	Stats

View All

J. Taylor vs L. Pleming Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Taylor	Stats	L. Pleming
61.22% (161/102)	YTD Win/Loss	32.88% (48/98)
58.74% (353/248)	Sets Win/Loss	36.45% (117/204)
53.61% (2915/2522)	Games Win/Loss	43.58% (1232/1595)
64.00% (96/54)	Hard Win/Loss	28.81% (17/42)
40.00% (10/15)	Clay Win/Loss	14.81% (4/23)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.14% (4/3)
71.88% (46/18)	Grass Win/Loss	45.83% (22/26)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
475.88	Average Opponent Rank	486.77
50.00% (1/1)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
65.92% (118/61)	Challenger W/L	36.28% (41/72)
37.50% (9/15)	Futures W/L	20.00% (1/4)
62% (157/255)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	32% (46/144)
100% (2/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
58% (15/26)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	42% (5/12)
58% (48/83)	Deciding Set Win %	24% (8/33)
91% (143/130)	1st Set Won, Won Match	71% (62/44)
9% (143/13)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	29% (62/18)
25% (115/29)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	2% (82/2)